Problems in Healthcare Leadership

Published: 2021-08-08 06:15:07
essay essay

Category: Health Care

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

IntroductionLeadership is a dynamic term that utilities unique styles under different managerial positions. It is the responsibility of the leaders to realise the most significant leadership style by analysing the challenge against the goals. Leadership in healthcare facilities has recently come under scrutiny in Australia. The main challenges in the facilities include; non-prioritized funding, poor funding for research, non-equalized allocation of doctors and differences in healthcare quality. To make a realistic report on the effects of leadership, five physicians from three different hospitals were interviewed for their opinions on the factors of leadership, their significance and effects to both the physicians’ activities and the health delivery process for the patients. First, the effect of leadership by physicians was analysed based on their effectiveness and significance in the leadership style. Secondly, the various leadership styles were formulated, and their qualities analysed. The identified leadership factors in the interview were compared to the formulated major leadership styles and the factors linked to either of the leadership styles. Recommendations were then drawn from the effects of the various leadership styles in addressing various challenges. Problems faced in the healthcare facilities require strategic management skills by the leaders. The choices leaders make are further determined by experience and preference over different leadership styles to curb unique challenges.Literature ReviewIt is questionable whether physicians are better qualified to lead medical institutions compared to similarly qualified leaders without medical skills. Research has shown improved performance in healthcare institutions when a physician “who has excellent leadership skills would outperform a non-physician with equivalent leadership skills,” (Dickson, 2016, p. 1 para2). Most significant in leadership is the understanding of the employees, doctors, that is accorded by a physician leading a healthcare centre. Because a doctor understands the theatrics and tricks of doctors, a leader picked from physicians detects anomalies and disingenuous acts, fast and precisely. Also, because the physician understands the doctors, the physician leader stands a better chance to maintain credibility with fellow physicians. The credibility is attained because the physician leader relates to challenges in healthcare from the physicians’ and nurses’ perspective which a leader not trained in medicine wouldn’t understand.The relationship between the health facilities and federal governments affects the curative and preventive measures adopted against diseases and their causes. Better leadership by in the hospitals could involve the government and ensure a reduction in the number of patients from preventable diseases. While the hospitals identify preventive initiatives, they “do not reach out effectively to those most at risk,” (Armstrong, Gillespie, Leeder, Rubin, & Russel, 2007, p. 485 para 8). The preventive initiatives are only administered at the hospitals because the leaders lack the funds and knowledge of the most affected areas. The poor population in Australia has no access to quality medical care (Armstrong, Gillespie, Leeder, Rubin, & Russel, 2007, p. 487). To realise equality in the access to medical care, the healthcare leaders are required to consult with the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. The commission was developed to analyse the differences in the delivery of quality medical care and funding of the hospitals.Methodology and ApproachTo create a realistic understanding of the challenges in hospitals as a result of leadership management skills, health practitioners from different hospitals were interviewed. The interviews were diversified to cover medical practitioners working in different departments. The interview majored in the challenges faced in healthcare facilities and their effects on both the patients and physicians.The questions asked regarding the challenges were crucial in identifying the similarity and repetition of problems. Thus the question on the challenges was not limited to the number challenges. As a solution, the interviewees were to answer on the factors of leadership they felt were most effective. The personal opinions on leadership factors were used to argue the approach on the effectiveness of different leadership factors. Further, the interviewees gave the leadership factors they felt had the major effect on both their activities and the healthcare practice to the patients. Lastly, the physicians were to relate the effect of the various leadership factors to their relationships and with services to patients.Preliminary FindingsThe interviews revealed the major leadership factors and the associated benefits and limitations regarded with either. Because the employees answered open-ended questions, they did not give particular leadership factors and styles. Hence, a list of the various leadership styles was identified and the qualities identified by the clinicians compared to them. The identified leadership styles were (Knights, 2018);Visionary- leaders whose vision for an organisation is developed from the opinions of every employee through teamwork. The incorporation all employees’ opinions are done to ensure their commitment to the realisation of the vision. Its main characteristics are; transparency in the processes, self-confidence among the employees, brings about changes with all employees and inspires the employees to implement the vision because they relate with the vision (Knights, 2018, p. 2).Coaching- leaders that allow their subjects to develop their careers by taking advantage of opportunities. This model of leadership helps, “individuals become more independent and engaged, and take greater responsibility as a result of building competence,” (Knights, 2018). This model tends to support other leadership styles because it takes the opinions of all employees. Coaching by the leaders should be natural and assertive which lacks in most leaders; hence, leaders should understand the leadership style before implementing it. When correctly applied, it has the following qualities; improved relationship awareness by developing others, social-awareness (hence, empathy) and emotional self-awareness (Knights, 2018, p. 3).Affiliative- leaders that emphasise cohesiveness and harmony among the team members, group or firm. The focus of this style is the emotional needs of individual employees, hence, building emotional bonds. This method is used on a regular basis to emphasise emotional support from distressing situations. The leadership is limited because the focus on employees’ emotions deviates the attention of the employees; especially because it has no significance in the performance. Its main qualities are; significant in conflict solving and management, building bonds, and bringing about empathy (Knights, 2018, p. 4).Democratic- leaders that emphasise engagement, buy-in and commitment among all the employees and occasionally from the community such as patients. Although similar to the visionary leadership style, the democratic leaders do not decide the opinions and contributions of the employees to adopt in an organisation. Consequently, the employees feel like a team when their ideas are debated and voted by fellow employees. Its main qualities are; self-awareness among the employees, transparency in the management, inspirational leadership and brings about overall changes in an organisation. It is most effective because it involves the affected parties in the developing of solutions and the ideas of the implementing team (Knights, 2018, p. 5). In turn, it ensures maximum information on the method of implementation and the parties involved are committed.Pace-setting- leaders that set high standards for the employees with the expectation that employees will follow their expectations. Because it is a goal-oriented leadership style, it ensures to realise the maximum capacity and capability of the employees. In turn, the employees feel overworked which limits the self-awareness, empathy and teamwork leadership qualities. Its positive qualities are; ensures achievement of goals and elicits the initiative character among the employees (Knights, 2018, p. 6).Commander- requires that the employees comply with their decisions and agenda. This leadership style neglects the input of other employees. The leaders rely on instincts and desire to bring about changes. It is backed by the desire for the leaders to set an example for the employees and assume a sense of authority. Its main qualities are; bold leadership, exclusive of other employees’ ideas, and goal oriented (Knights, 2018, p. 7).The interviewed employees identified several challenges in the delivery of healthcare services. This research further sought an analytical understanding of the causes of the difficulties identified from the leadership perspective. The varied challenges prevent the distribution of the healthcare services;Outdated technology- amidst the policies “associated with pooling and cashing out of funds, financing barriers still exist,” (Wakerman, et al., 2009, p. 90). The consequence of lack of funds is that public hospitals still use ineffective and outdated technology. The lack of proper funding was seen to emanate from the lack of streamlined flow of information regarding prioritisation of the necessary machines.Workforce supply- healthcare employees, are unwilling to work in rural areas. This has led to reduced numbers of medical attendants in these regions with “serious shortages of general practitioners, dentists, nurses, and some key allied health workers,” (Armstrong, Gillespie, Leeder, Rubin, & Russel, 2007, p. 486). This has led to an increase in non-indigenous doctors’ percentage rise to 25% from 19%.Health Inequality- health care services in the less affluent and bush areas are not as advanced as those in the city. Employee satisfaction rate is different due to differences in allowances and insurance benefits. Due to poor funding skills, the institutions in the less affluent areas offer little to no benefits and insurance covers for the physicians.Private and Public Healthcare Funding- shifting access of medical services is noted due to the privatisation of health services. The private hospitals provide equal but in some cases, better and advanced services. “The 57% of Australians without private health insurance,” are left to pay for the procedures only offered by private institutions form their money (Armstrong, Gillespie, Leeder, Rubin, & Russel, 2007, p. 487).Medical Research issues- although Australia has made breakthroughs in the medical faculty, the country lacks;Structures that integrate the national health to the medical research plansPrioritization of research with regards to national healthDeliberate objectives in the allocation of the available scarce fundsFactors for Effective LeadershipEstablish Trust and Demonstrate IntegrityIntegrity in leadership implies consistency in words and actions for the leaders. Thus, the leaders employing this factor should (Holcomb, 2006, p. 1 para 3);Only say what they mean to doSpeak from experience and not mere opinionBe principled and courageous in standing for rightPractice transparency and authenticityEnsure safety of sensitive information“The honesty and transparency in activities are important because, mostly, it’s the health of a patient that we deal with,” Doctor, Mater Hospital. This comment serves to justify the importance of honesty. Consequently, the honesty leads to trust between the medical practitioners and the patients. These attributes show the application of the affiliative leadership because it the leadership at Mater recognises the emotional attachment of the patients to their loved ones.“Changes in the processes and guidelines are derived from prior experience such as the introduction of covers for stretchers. It was through the Integrity factor that the hospital introduced this protective garment after a patient contracted a bacterial disease from the stretcher,” registered nurse; St Vincent’s Hospital. “St Vincent realizes that our individual opinions collectively matter. During the recent transfer of practitioners, the identified transfer candidates were asked to confirm. Few of us were allowed to stay because we still had projects that we not completely implemented,” assistant nurse; St Vincent’s Hospital. These comments by the nurses outline the importance of honesty and integrity leadership factors. The freedom of the employees and honesty make the leadership factor a visionary leadership style. Both affiliative and visionary leadership styles are seen to work efficiently in different hospitals to achieve a common goal; trust and integrity among the employees.Set Clear DirectionThe hospital leadership should be deliberate in its guidelines to ensure a precise sense of direction. Instructions such as timetable ensure that the processes are regulated, and all employees are made aware. Other skills used in this factor include (Holcomb, 2006, p. 1 para 4);Consistency and simplicity of the formulated goals and strategiesElimination of short-term goalsHiring and deploying the right professionalsEmpowering people to realise the impact of their actionsConsistent and compelling communication between the employees and patientsInclude other employees in setting the direction“Consistency is important in creating normalcy within an organisation. The kind of leadership as a result of the clear direction leadership emphasises professionalism in the conduct of the medical practitioners. This is important because the practitioners are limited to whatever is documented in the medical books. Changes are allowed, but they have to be approved by the majority of the team,” Chief Pediatric Officer: St Vincent’s Hospital. The empowerment of employees and regarding of their opinions make this style a democratic leadership.Focus on ResultsThis employs the personalisation factor; employees are individually responsible for their actions. This factor employs the following skills (Holcomb, 2006, p. 1 para 5);Keeping track of the realisation of the objectives and holding individuals accountablePatience in removing and overcoming obstaclesUse of all the available resourcesRecognize individual efforts of the employeesAllow short-term goals; these are allowed to realise the primary goals“The true definition of a situation is the final results of it. The pace-setter leadership style emphasises individual success. This way, individual practitioners are made aware of the consequence of their actions. While it emphasises perfection, it reiterates the importance of patience in the process,” Chief Operations Manager; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. This comment emphasises the importance of the leadership factor in realising the individual efforts and growth in the medical field. This style of leadership focuses on goals to implement changes; hence it is a pace-setting leadership.Potential Outcomes of Effective LeadershipThese leadership factors are important in the identification of errors in the medical industry and provide both long-term and short-term solutions. The leadership is important because of; “achievement of health reform objectives, timely care delivery, system integrity and efficiency in the healthcare system,” (Daly, Jackson, Manix, Davidson, & Hutchinson, 2014, p. 77). The leadership styles can be used individually or simultaneously because they all have different impacts in an organisation (Knights, 2018, p. 1). The democratic leadership style seeks to have the opinions of the health practitioners on areas of improvement while the pace-setting leadership style calls for all members to act following the laid down processes. The resulting leadership demands that all employees be responsible for their actions; hence be creative in forming alternatives.RecommendationFrom the interviews and the leadership factors, some recommendations in the management of hospitals were developed;Improved communication between the healthcare facilities’ leaders and the federal government to plan on funding and allocation of health facilities. The teamwork is necessary because; while the government manages the funds, it falls short on the prioritisation necessary in the funding to its people (Wakerman, et al., 2009, p. 90). Further, the healthcare leaders should engage commissions such as the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare because it was developed to expand the limits of the healthcare facilities (Armstrong, Gillespie, Leeder, Rubin, & Russel, 2007, p. 8).Motivation is critical in the management of employees, and hence the government should ensure that all physicians receive bonuses and insurance covers. This will implore the physicians to work in any area their superiors post them.Research-based activities in medicine should be exempted from tax (Henry, 2009, p. 7). The result is reduced funds in the search for a cure and better preventive measures hence allowing further research with the scarce funds available.The identified leadership styles have different results and hence should all be considered in the management of a healthcare centre. However, the visionary leadership style should be used along with other styles due to its ability to motivate all the employees in implementing successful healthcare practices.ConclusionThe interviews were critical in showing the different leadership styles and their effects in addressing various challenges in the healthcare facilities. The six major leadership styles were tabulated and their qualities compared to the qualities that the interviewed physicians identified as leadership factors that were most effective. Recommendations made to the healthcare leadership personnel were formed from the generalised impact of the effects and challenges of each. Because the leadership styles have different results for unique challenges, none was recommended for a particular challenge. The leaders should, therefore, utilise the most effective leadership style in realising a successful healthcare delivery system.ReferencesArmstrong, B. K., Gillespie, J. A., Leeder, S. R., Rubin, G. L., & Russel, L. M. (2007). Challenges in health and health care for Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 189(9), 48485-489. Retrieved from, J., Jackson, D., Manix, J., Davidson, P. M., & Hutchinson, M. (2014). The Importance of Clinical Leadership in the Hospital; Setting. School of Health and Human Science, 2014(6), 75-83. Retrieved from, G. (2016). Exemplary Practices of Medical Leadership in Australia: In Their Own Words. The Royal Australasian College of Medical Administrators, 1(1), 1. Retrieved from, K. (2009). Australia’s Future Tax System. Langton Crescent: Australian Council for International Development. Retrieved from, M. (2006). Leadership Effectiveness Factors. KEMPS, 1, 1. Retrieved from, J. (2018). Using Different Leadership Styles. In J. Knights, D. Grant, & G. Young, Leading Beyond the Ego (pp. Chapter 8 1-7). New York: Routledge.Wakerman, J., Humphreys, J. S., Wells, R., Kuipers, P., Jones, J. A., Entwistle, P., & Kinsman, L. (2009). Features of effective primary health care models. Models of Care, 191(2), 88-91. Retrieved from

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read