Contextual AnalysisIn recent times, the lawn industry of Pakistan has evolved from being categorized and positioned as a low category product, to a premium level consumer item. This evolution has made the lawn production, marketing and consumption a multimillion business that is being promoted even further as the fashion designers have stepped in with high level of competition. However, the concerns are being raised for what factors have resulted in such a drastic evolution and change in marketing positioning of the entire textile segment – as the consumers are now willing to pay premium level price for the products that were once considered low level consumer items. Observations have shown that this willingness to pay a premium level cost for lawn items in Pakistan has been the result of altered brand perception and recognition through premium level advertisements and marketing campaigns.Considering this evolving trend, there is a need for the researchers and marketers to study and identify the possible causes of this evolution and evaluate if this bubble will continue to grow or might burst in near future. Are the consumers willing to continue paying premium prices for the lawn products? If yes, then what are the factors that will keep this trend alive in Pakistan. However, there is a lack of research focusing on the trends of Pakistani culture and its impact on the consumerism. Therefore, respective contextual analysis will briefly rely on the theoretical evidences that explain the willingness of consumer to pay for the consumer products based on their shaped up brand perceptions and beliefs that further impact the contextual pricing strategy of the marketers and producers as well.Problem BackgroundThe making of a brand infers conveying a specific brand perception such that all the association’s objective gatherings connection such a brand (and in this manner the products sold utilizing its status) with an arrangement of associations. Brand value inquire about in showcasing is established in psychological brain science and spotlights on consumer intellectual procedures (Li, i & Kambele, 2012). Along these lines, this perspective of brand value recommends that:the product makes value for both the consumer and the organization;the product offers some incentive to the organization by creating value for the consumers; andThe sense of association of consumer are a key component in brand value arrangement and administration.The issue of product value has developed as a standout amongst the most basic zones for advertising administration. Notwithstanding solid enthusiasm for the subject, in any case, to date scarce studies has been led with a specific end goal to explore which brand associations have the most grounded consequences for consumer conduct. Some of these works just receive a hypothetical point of view, without playing out an experimental test (Netemeyer et al. 2004). Also, a few of the observational investigations made break down the general connection between brand perception and consumer reaction, in other words, without considering the diverse measurements of brand associations (Netemeyer et al. 2004).Significance Of Brand Associations In spite of the fact that there has not generally been concession to how to gauge product perception (Lassar et al. 1995), one for the most part acknowledged view is that, reliable with an associative system memory show, product perception can be characterized as perceptions about a product as reflected by the bunch of associations that consumers interface with the product name in memory. Hence, product associations are the other enlightening hubs connected to the product hub in memory and contain the importance of the product for consumers.One approach to recognize product associations is by their level of deliberation, that is, by how much data is compressed or subsumed in the association. In accordance with this basis, (Lassar et al. 1995) classifies product associations into three noteworthy classifications: traits, advantages and mentalities. Qualities are those spellbinding highlights that describe a product, for example, what a consumer thinks the product is or has and what is included with its buy or consumption. Advantages are the individual value consumers append to the product traits, that is, the thing that consumers figure the product can improve the situation them. Product states of mind are consumers’ general evaluations of a product.The associations identified with the tendencies speak to a more prominent level of reflection than those alluding to the qualities, as are more available and stay longer in the consumer’s memory (Faircloth et al. 2001). A further particular component of the tendencies is that they have a positive nature, that is, the product value is more prominent, the higher the level. Consequently, and given the enthusiasm of working with a multidimensional measure of product associations, we will look at the associations concerning the tendencies.Product Functions and AssociationsWhile delimiting product works the best trouble lies in the modest number and the separating idea of studies looking at their dimensionality. Besides, most works don’t make an unequivocal refinement between product tendencies and product tendencies. Product tendencies are associations identified with the physical or unmistakable properties, as are available in all products, even in those sold without a product or with an obscure product.Product tendencies, then again, are associations identified with immaterial credits or images added to the product because of its product name, that is, they speak to benefits that must be gotten from products with a product.The study aims to propose that estimating product works through the measurements of assurance, individual distinguishing proof, social ID and status.The assurance work, understanding by this the guarantee or certification of value, depends on the evaluation that the product is solid, productively does its execution characteristics and meets the created desires (Bendixen et al. 2004). Essentially, it is fitting to associate this tendency with the perception that the product is connected to products with an appropriate level of execution and is worried about advantageously fulfilling consumer needs, contributing assortment and development (Bendixen et al. 2004).The individual recognizable proof tendency is identified with the way that consumers can distinguish themselves with a few products and create sentiments of liking towards them. In the writing on product impact, a fundamental hypothesis alludes to the harmoniousness between the consumer’s conduct, his mental self view and the product image. This hypothesis depends on the possibility that people can enhance their mental self portrait through the images of the products they purchase and utilize. Along these lines, the hypothesis maintains that the more noteworthy the consistency between the product perception and the consumer’s mental self view, the better the consumer’s evaluation of a product and the more prominent his aim to get it (Faircloth et al. 2001).The social recognizable proof tendency depends on the product’s tendency to go about as a correspondence instrument permitting the consumer showing the want to be coordinated or, despite what might be expected, to separate himself from the gatherings of people that make up his nearest social condition. Consumers keen on this tendency will decidedly value those products that appreciate a decent notoriety among the gatherings with which they have a place with or try to shape some portion of (Homburg et al. 2005).The status work communicates the esteem level of consumer and distinction that the consumer may involvement after utilizing the product (Homburg et al. 2005). As per (Homburg et al. 2005), this tendency depends on five attributes of the product:image of the person’s energy and societal position;impression of social approval;selectiveness or constraint of the offer to few individuals;commitment of enthusiastic encounters; andspecialized prevalence.Along these lines, the status work, much the same as the social recognizable proof tendency, is uncovered on account of the need of people to impart certain impressions to individuals in their social condition. Notwithstanding, the distinction between the two tendencies lies in the way that the social ID work is identified with the want to be acknowledged by and feel individuals from specific gatherings. Then again, the status work compares to the person’s want to accomplish esteem and acknowledgment from others, without this essentially implying the product is illustrative of their social gathering.Impacts Of Product Works On The Consumer Reaction The above tendencies will produce value to the organization in the degree that they condition the consumer reaction to the advertising of the product. Subsequently, (Chen & Chang, 2008) characterizes product value as the differential impact that product information has on consumer reaction to the promoting of the product (as far as consumer perceptions, inclinations and conduct, e.g. product decision, understanding of duplicate focuses from an advertisement, responses to a coupon advancement, or evaluations of a proposed product expansion). Along these lines, he comprehends that product value is sure if consumers respond all the more positively to a product and the way it is advertised when the product is recognized, when contrasted with an anonymous or falsely named, and accordingly obscure, rendition of the product.The impact of product works on consumer reaction constitutes an exceedingly imperative subject while breaking down the value the product has for the organization.Significance of Contextual Price Information Because of the noteworthy impact of contextual data, it is important to investigate the basic criteria utilized by consumers to judge the validity of data. Expanding on past research about consumer value evaluations (Anselmsson et al. 2014), this investigation contends that the assimilation and difference impacts can be utilized to portray how consumers evaluate rich contextual data and coordinate it into their IRP and that these impacts additionally impact consumers’ willingness to pay after the advancement closes. (De Pelsmacker et al. 2005) proposed that the component cover between the context and the objective product manages whether assimilation or differentiation impacts happen. As contended above, consumers utilize different sorts of contextual value data as stays to appraise their willingness to pay for a supplementary product. We recommend that consumers utilize their IRP, which is the underlying grapple, as a model to decide if they will apply outside value data. As indicated by assimilation-differentiate hypothesis (Whan Park et al. 2010), consumers have a circulation of costs that they consider to be adequate. Contextual value data will be assimilated just if judged to fall inside that circulation (De Pelsmacker et al. 2005). The sorts of contextual value data talked about incorporate the cost of the central product, the limited time cost of the supplementary product, and the first cost of the supplementary product.Alongside the assimilation and complexity impacts, social judgment hypothesis, as proposed by (Whan Park et al. 2010), is additionally useful to clarify how consumers judge the contextual value data. They contended that individuals’ state of mind is an amalgam of three scopes: acknowledgment, lack of bias (non-responsibility), and dismissal. The scope of acknowledgment is the scope of data that a man considers as sensible or deserving of thought; the scope of dismissal is the scope of data that a man considers as nonsensical or shocking; and the scope of impartiality (non-responsibility) which lies amidst these alternate extremes is the scope of data that a man considers as neither satisfactory nor sketchy (Koschate-Fischer et al. 2012). Correspondingly, when consumers evaluate the contextual value data, they utilize their IRP as one of the criteria to judge which scope the contextual value data has a place with. At the point when the contextual value data has a place with the scope of lack of bias or dismissal, it doesn’t turn into a conceivable grapple on the grounds that the data is viewed as immaterial or irrational. Contextual value data can be a helpful stay just when it falls inside the scope of acknowledgment.Summary The present investigation has broke down the product perception in view of the tendencies or advantages that the consumer associates with the product. The essential target was to think about the impact of these tendencies on specific parts of consumer reaction equipped for creating upper hands for the organization.It has been discovered that it is intriguing for organizations to examine the diverse measurements that make up the product perception. Each of these can have an alternate incidence on the conceivable consumer reactions that decide the points of interest that the product can furnish the organization with. Specifically, in the lawn industry of Pakistan, it has been watched that the association of the product with the certification work supports the proposal of the product, the acquiring of a value premium and product expansion to other product classifications. Thusly, the social identification work positively affects value premium and the acknowledgment of product augmentation. Then again, the individual identification and status tendencies impact suggestion and expansion separately.ReferencesLi, G., Li, G., & Kambele, Z. (2012). Luxury fashion brand consumers in China: Perceived value, fashion lifestyle, and willingness to pay. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1516-1522.Netemeyer, R. G., Krishnan, B., Pullig, C., Wang, G., Yagci, M., Dean, D., … & Wirth, F. (2004). Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand value. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 209-224.Lassar, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A. (1995). Measuring customer-based brand value. Journal of consumer marketing, 12(4), 11-19.Faircloth, J. B., Capella, L. M., & Alford, B. L. (2001). The effect of brand attitude and brand perception on brand value. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(3), 61-75.Bendixen, M., Bukasa, K. A., & Abratt, R. (2004). Brand value in the business-to-business market. Industrial marketing management, 33(5), 371-380.Homburg, C., Koschate, N., & Hoyer, W. D. (2005). Do satisfied customers really pay more? A study of the relationship between customer satisfaction and willingness to pay. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 84-96.Chen, C. F., & Chang, Y. Y. (2008). Airline brand value, brand preference, and purchase intentions—The moderating effects of switching costs. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(1), 40-42.Anselmsson, J., Vestman Bondesson, N., & Johansson, U. (2014). Brand perception and customers’ willingness to pay a price premium for food brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(2), 90-102.De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee. Journal of consumer affairs, 39(2), 363-385.Whan Park, C., MacInnis, D. J., Priester, J., Eisingerich, A. B., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand value drivers. Journal of marketing, 74(6), 1-17.Koschate-Fischer, N., Diamantopoulos, A., & Oldenkotte, K. (2012). Are consumers really willing to pay more for a favorable country image? A study of country-of-origin effects on willingness to pay. Journal of International Marketing, 20(1), 19-41.Buil, I., Martínez, E., & De Chernatony, L. (2013). The influence of brand value on consumer responses. Journal of consumer marketing, 30(1), 62-74.