IntroductionDeath penalty, which is also been referred as the capital punishment exists in the society since hundreds of years. Even from began, the argument regarding this punishment is being among the society whether it’s morally right or wrong. The perspective those who favors such kind of punishment credit it for controlling the violent crimes but on the other hand, who are against this act of punishment presents the prospect that the motive of the criminal who commits the violent crime holds several other motives which can’t be stopped whether putting the death penalty of not. The violent crimes which happened in the society comes strait from the different set of thoughts and a state of mind and it can’t be stopped for this significant act of punishment. The thought of committing such act of violent crimes have lead the criminal to believe that he/she will never be caught and the other reason can be that the fear being caught is eliminated when the killer believes it’s the work of God which lead him/her to kill someone(Bohm, 25). Furthermore, this research paper will analyze both the arguments along with the morality or immorality of such an act of punishment.DiscussionThe most common argument which states that death penalty should remain enacted because not only it brings the justice in the society by punishing severely to the criminal, it also sets an example for those who had the slightest amount of motivation and determination towards committing any violent crime. The high rate of crime not only exists only in the United States of America but in fact other nations are also facing this problem. The killing and rape of innocent people for any particular reason or no reason at all has increased the disability in the society. Even if the death penalty which will not decrease the crime rate but still it plays its role by making a person think twice whether to commit violent crime or not. It’s the fear of punishment which will hold them. Every human being desire not to die and even the criminals also thinks the same way of facing the death. The violent crimes which will grant them the death will hold them and make those criminals think that if the crime is writhing losing the life or not. The studies have been conducted in order to know the perspective of general public and also the rise and fall in crime rate in result of death penalty. The results show that there are significant amount of people who are against the death penalty but the result also shows that those nations who had stopped giving death penalty are facing rise in the crime rate. Apart from the crime rate and the general perception regarding the death penalty, at least those who had lost the loved ones would be able to have the satisfaction of receiving the justice by seeing the predator facing death sentence (Canes-Wrone et al., 15).After being goring through the arguments of in favor of capital punishment, there are several of the views which are against the death penalty and even the law enforcement agencies have several representative who voted against the capital punishment. Those people who are experienced in this field where they have face and deal several of the violent criminals believes that death penalty is not the solution of the violent crimes. The studies which had been conducted to figure out how many families who are in favor or against the death penalty and the result shows that now people don’t believe that granting death to criminal have replaced the amount of grief which they had to go through (Osler, Mark and Jeanne, 6). Considering all the other aspects, which includes the cost of activities which happens when giving the death penalty, the surety that all the evidence had been tested and the chance of giving another chance are worth to go through. The other most significant aspect of death penalty is that usually it is given to people who are non-white which is Cleary a discrimination on behalf of law enforcement. The psychiatrists who have conducted studies also stated that the criminal who committed violent crimes are mostly mentally handicapped. The mental state doesn’t only involve the insanity or disturbed but low IQ is also considered to be the reason of committing violent crime. The economic condition of people have also made them suffered enough that the current miserable condition started influencing them the fear of the consequences also lost it meaning to them. The state in which they had been living since the birth was difficult enough that death started to seem the escape for them. In the end, the human rights activists also been influencing the government for eliminating such act of punishment which is against the law of morality. The person who had committed any crime and found guilty deserves the chance to make amends (Vaughn, 67).ConclusionsIn conclusion, the death penalty which started since several of the years by the kings to bring law and orders are still being enacted. Both the arguments which had been presented and analyzed here are true to their own place and should be considered in every case where the death penalty punishment is being considered. The lack of understanding of the consequences along with the mental state suggests that every human being serve the second chance to make amends so that he/she could live civil life. It is always being immoral to kill anyone whether on a personal motive, punishment or if the criminal believes that he/she is committing the act of God.Works CitedBohm, Robert M. Deathquest: An introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States. Taylor & Francis, 2016.Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Tom S. Clark, and Jason P. Kelly. “Judicial selection and death penalty decisions.” American Political Science Review 108.1 (2014): 23-39.Osler, Mark, and Jeanne Bishop. “Victims: Transforming the Death Penalty Debate.” Capital Punishment: New Perspectives. Routledge, 2016. 131-144.Vaughn, Lewis. Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. WW Norton & Company, 2015.