Introduction Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an infection causing type of bacteria that is found in the environment. It is a gram-negative, rod shaped bacterium and it causes infections to both plants and animals. P aeruginosa is an opportunistic disease causing bacteria. In majority of infection cases, the integrity to the physical barriers to infection such as the skin and mucous membrane is missing. There could also be an underlying immune deficiency condition such as immunosuppression.The infections caused by this bacteria to humans are complicated and can cause death. Infections occur mostly in patients with compromised immune systems and those who are in the hospital. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the commonly isolated bacteria from patients who are hospitalised for more than one week. According to Williams (9), the most common causing agent of nosocomial infections. Types of pseudomonas infections include pneumonia, gastrointestinal tract (GIT) infections, skin and soft tissue infections, skeletal infections, and eye infections. Other infections are meningitis, septicaemia, endocarditis, bacteraemia, and malignant otitis externa.People at high risk of P aeruginosa infections are patients. Resent research (1) indicates that infections are especially common in patients with burn wounds, acute leukaemia, drug addictions, organ transplants, and cystic fibrosis. It is rare but possible for healthy people to also get mild infections with pseudomonas aeruginosa particularly after being exposed to water. Exposure to poorly treated water in hot tubs or swimming pools, may result to ear infections and skin rushes mostly in children.Microbiological investigations on P. aeruginosa are important since pseudomonas infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients who have compromised immune systems. Reasons why the investigations are done is to confirm the presence of an outbreak of pseudomonas infections. Outbreaks are common in a hospital setting where patients have been hospitalised for more than one week and among patients with compromised immune systems. Surgical, cystic fibrosis patients, cancer and burn patients are susceptible to these outbreaks.Another reason is to identify the source or sources of the outbreak. This is useful so that the infection can be contained and prevent spread to other patients. Spread of pseudomonas infections inside the hospital can be prevented through thorough hand washing by both nurses and patients. Also ensuring that the hospital equipment are always clean. Some bacteria can however become resistant to detergents and sanitisers used in the hospital. Therefore investigations and testing should be done often to determine if there is resistance so that the department can act appropriately. Outside the hospital use only the hot tubs and swimming pools that have been properly treated. After swimming shower with soap and dry your ears to prevent infections.Microbiological investigations are also done is to explain the various ways that the infection is transmitted. Transmission of infections among patients could be through contaminated medical tools and apparatus and multi- vials drugs and through the personnel such as nurses as they attend to many patients.From all microbiological investigations there are some outcomes that are expected. The outcomes include whether there is an infection and determine the presence of an infection causing pathogen is. We also expect to determine the type of bacteria that causing the infection example Pseudomonas aeruginosa. From the investigations we also expect to know which part has been affected by the infection. It could be GI tract, ear and eye infection, pneumonia among others. Morbidity and mortality rates of pseudomonas infections can be determined from these investigations. These investigations are beneficial as they enable the medical personnel to take appropriate actions based on the results, so as to deal with the identified condition.The objective of these exercise is to investigate the presence of infection in a 22 year old patient with cystic fibrosis. The patient attends the clinic for a routine sputum culture procedure. The procedure are done to identify the present disease causing bacteria. CLSI tests were also conducted to determine the responses of the bacteria to different drugs.Materials and methodsThe sputum sample was isolated from the patient. It was based on the patient’s clinical history. The sample was also inoculated on three different media. The media include MacConkey Agar (MAC), hour’s blood agar (HBA), and chocolate agar (CHA) which were incubated in an aerobic environment for 24 hours at 37°C. In addition, the gram staining method is the first test and it was done to differentiate the bacterial groups and to observe numerous types of cells such as epithelial cells, polymorphs and normal flora. The materials and methods of gram stain were as explained in Medical Microbiology, Techniques Manual, Department of school of science, The RMIT University, (2016) page (8).In addition, a number of biochemical tests were done to determine the family of this pathogen. Methods and materials were as referred to Medical Microbiology, Techniques Manual, Department of school of science, The RMIT University. The biochemical tests are as follows:Oxidase test (p 23)Urease test (p 30)Indole production test (p 16)Gram stain test (p 8)Nitrate reduction test (p 20)Oxidation –fermentation test (p24)Anti- microbial susceptibility test (p 39)ResultsTestsResultGram stain(-ve)Oxidase(+ve)Urease(-ve)Indole production(-ve)Nitrate reduction(+ve)Oxidation-fermentation test(+ve)Growth anaerobically(-ve)Growth on MacConkey(+ve)Growth on Horse blood agar (HBA)(+ve)Growth on Chocolate agar (CHA)(+ve)Growth at 42(+ve)Fluorescent pigments (pyoveedins)(+ve)Table 1: examines the results of several tests that has done to identify the pathogenAntimicrobial drugZone size(mm)RespondCaflazidime (CAZ)0ResistanceImpenem (IPM)9ResistanceCiprofloxacin (CIP)25susceptibleGentamicin (CN)0ResistanceTable 2: displays the responses for different antimicrobial using the CLSI test:The organism in case study 47 was clarified using a number of methods. The first method to be conducted was the gram stain test. The results showed that there were many gram-negative bacilli with some polymorphs cells. As indicated in table 1, the organism shows growth on both CHA agar and HBA agar with large creamy grey colonies. Furthermore, it indicates growth on both Nutrient agar and MCA agar with largely pink circular colonies. The pink circular colonies mean that the organism is not considered to be fastidious. However, no growth can be seen for the family of gram- negative rods bacteria on an anaerobic media.A number of biochemical tests were conducted to find out the family that this organism belong to. To illustrate, the results from Nitrate reduction test and Oxidase test are positive, while the results from the Indole production test are negative. From the results, it was possible to group the organism as member of Pseudomonas.To differentiate this organism from other members of Pseudomonas, there are two distinct methods that were done. First method was Oxidation-fermentation test which showed a positive result and also showed that the organisms’ growth was at 42. The Fluorescent pigment was experimented on MacConkey agar as well. Therefore, all the results from the number of tests done may confirm that the pathogen is considered to be P. aeruginosa.Besides, the results of CLSI susceptibility test showed different responses to the antibacterial drugs. For example, Ciprofloxacin (CIP) showed a significant effect on the pathogen. However, there is no effect seen from Ceftazidime (CAZ), Gentamicin (CN) and Imipenem (IPM) on the pathogen. This means that the pathogen has a resistance response these antibacterial drugs.DiscussionCystic fibrosis is a common inherited disease among the Caucasians in the United States. About 35000 people are currently living with the disease. It is important to understand the treatment of infections in cystic fibrosis it is complicated and particular and is no longer restricted to paediatrics department. Greater than 30% of the patients living with cystic fibrosis currently are over the age of 18 years.In this study, tests were conducted to identify the organism to its genus and species level. The first test to be conducted was the gram stain test. From this test the results showed that there were many gram-negative bacilli with some polymorphs cells. The organism showed growth on both CHA agar and HBA agar with large creamy grey colonies. The organism also indicated growth on both Nutrient agar and MCA agar with largely pink circular colonies. The pink circular colonies mean that the organism is not considered to be fastidious. However, no growth can be seen for the family of gram- negative rods bacteria on an anaerobic media.Biochemical tests were conducted to find out the family that this organism belong to. The tests were nitrate reduction test, indole production test and, oxidase test. The results from the Nitrate reduction test and Oxidase test are positive, while the results from the Indole production test are negative. From the results, the organism in question was identified as a member of Pseudomonas.To determine the species of the organism and to differentiate from other members of Pseudomonas, two distinct procedures that were done. The first procedure was Oxidation-fermentation test. This test showed a positive result and also indicated that the organisms’ growth was at 42. The second procedure was the Fluorescent pigment that was experimented on MacConkey agar as well. The results from all the tests done confirmed that the pathogen present in the patient’s sputum culture is P. aeruginosa.A susceptibility test was conducted to test the response of the bacteria to the different antibiotic medications. The tested drugs included Caflazidime (CAZ), Impenem (IPM), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), and Gentamicin (CN). The results of CLSI susceptibility test showed that there existed different responses of the drug to the antibacterial drugs. For example, Ciprofloxacin (CIP) showed a significant effect on the pathogen. No effect seen from Ceftazidime (CAZ), Gentamicin (CN) and Imipenem (IPM) on the pathogen. The results mean that the pathogen has a resistance response Ceftazidime (CAZ), Gentamicin (CN) and Imipenem (IPM) antibacterial drugs and thus they are not the best drugs to treat the infection. The bacteria shows it is susceptible to Ciprofloxacin (CIP) thus it is the most appropriate drug among the others to treat the infection.Treatment of severe infections is common place in the treatment in adult medicine worldwide. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common disease causing bacterial that causes more severe deterioration in the pulmonary function in the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis. Maintenance therapy on a daily basis is important for the control of severe infection with use of antibiotics for the treatment of infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Patients with Cystic fibrosis have complicated poly-microbial respiratory flora. According to Ahlgren, (10), cystic fibrosis patients require routine checks that my show various species of bacteria that may cause the complexity in the treatment and prevention of infections in these patients. Among the main causes of infections to cystic fibrosis patients is Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenza and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this case a sputum test was conducted on a 22 year old patient with cystic fibrosis. From the sputum test, we isolated mucoid pseudomonas aeruginosa.P. aeruginosa is an opportunistic disease causing bacteria. The bacteria is an oxidase positive, gram negative rod-shaped bacterium. It is commonly found in the environment and it causes infections to both plants and animals such as humans. In humans, it considered a common and severe disease causing pathogen in patients with cystic fibrosis. In cases of chronic infections, P. aeruginosa is thought to have the ability to undergo a “mucoid switch”. A mucoid switch is where the bacteria has the ability to obtain mutations that result to the mucoid phenotype. The mucoid phenotype is impressive as excess polysaccharide will frequently drip onto the lid of the plate when it is placed upside down during incubation.According to Gary (4), key characteristic of mucoid strains of P. aeruginosa include their ability to form biofilms. A biofilm consist of a matrix of polysaccharide, DNA and protein. The biofilms provide a protective barrier from antibiotics and the immune system. In addition, they may they may contribute to the growth of other bacteria within the environment. Presence of all the excess polysaccharide, make it can be hard to standardize the inoculum of mucoid isolates of P. aeruginosa. This is an important starting point for micro broth dilution method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing. It is for this reason that susceptibility tests of isolated mucoid is performed often y Kirby-Bauer (KB) diffusion method. The KB method is a test based on the zone of inhibition around the disks containing microbiological drugs. The type of bacteria isolated in this case was found to be susceptible to aztreonam, ceftazidime and piperacillin.EpidemiologySevere respiratory tract infections are the most significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is most common disease causing bacteria. In a study done in 2007, the expectancy of patients with cystic fibrosis was 36- 40 years old. Patients with P aeruginosa have a further decreased life expectancy of 30 years of age.Signs and symptomsPseudomonas infections affect certain parts of the body. The parts are as follows the respiratory tract (example infections such pneumonia), the blood stream (example of infection is bacteraemia), the heart example of infection is endocarditis. In addition, the Central nervous system (CNS) (example brain abscess and meningitis), the ear (infections such as otitis externa and media), gastro intestinal tract infections (example enteritis, diarrhoea, enterocolitis). Other affected parts are eyes (endophthalmitis, bacterial keratitis), skin infections (example ecthyma gangrenosum) and lastly the urinary tract. In severe cases pseudomonas infections lead to death Williams (9).Physical symptoms depend on the location and the type of infection. Symptoms are as follows:Pneumonia: signs and symptoms include fever, malnutrition, rales, rhonchi, cyanosis, hypoxia, and retractions. Sometimes shock with cystic fibrosis, clubbing, increase in anteroposterior (AP) diameter, cough and difficulty in breathing.Infections of the Skin and soft tissue: necrotic lesions, hemorrhagic infections, accompanied with erythema; subcutaneous noodles, cellulitis and fasciitis, deep abscesses; in burns, there are black or violaceous discoloration or eschar.Endocarditis: murmur, fever, and positive black culture results; exterior stigmata example Roth spots, Jane way lesions, Osler nodes, splinter hemorrhages.Gastro intestinal tract: diarrhea, dehydration, abdominal distention, signs of peritonitis and results of Shanghai fever.Eye infections: chronic mucopurulent discharge, lid swelling, conjunctival erythema and chemosis; vision is impaired, redness and pain.Bacteremia: signs and symptoms include jaundice, hypotension and shock; fever, tachycardia, and tachypnea.Skeletal infections: neurological defects; local tenderness and reduced range of movement.Malignant otitis externa: local lymphadenopathy; erythematous, swelling, and inflammation on the external auditory.Pathogenesis of the infectionAccording to Win Stanley (7), P aeruginosa is an opportunistic disease causing pathogen. It is rare but possible for it to cause infection to healthy persons. In most of the cases where there is infection, the integrity of the physical obstacles to infection example the skin and mucous membrane is usually compromised. There could also exist an underlying immune deficiency example immunosuppression whereby the body cannot fight of infections. In addition to this, this bacteria has little nutritional demands and it can survive in a wide range of conditions.The pathogenesis of pseudomonas infections is complicated and multifactorial. According to Langan (8), this bacteria species is invasive and toxic. According to Brian Ryall (2), there are 3 stages of the bacterial pathogenesis. They are bacterial attachment and colonisation, local infection and blood stream dissemination and disease. In the context of respiratory tract infection in patients with cystic fibrosis and those with a complicated mechanical ventilation, the importance of colonisation and adherence is clearly seen. The bacteria’s virulence is increased by production of extracellular proteases and this assists in bacterial adherence and invasion. P.aeruginosa has a number of virulence factors. All strains of bacteria have endotoxin. These endotoxins are a major factor in bacteraemia and shock as a result of sepsis.Treatment of pseudomonas infectionsInfections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are effectively treated with antibiotics. However, many pseudomonas infections are becoming more difficult to treat with time. According to Darch (6) This is because the bacteria has the ability to mutate and once it has undergone mutation it develops antibiotic resistance and thus become unresponsive to the available medications. Antibiotic resistance means that the bacteria has acquired the capability to take on and overcome an antibiotic in its environment. Antibiotic resistance has made treatment of infections difficult. Pseudomonas infections can acquire resistance to multiple types of antibiotics at the same time.To determine which antibiotic will work best to a certain patient, a specimen is sent to the laboratory. In the laboratory the specimen will undergo testing to determine which antibiotic will work best for the particular bacteria. According to Darch, treatment can involve use of one of more antibiotics. A combination treatment should be considered in cases of severe infection. The combination should however be in accordance to the local susceptibility patterns. Types of antibiotics include: ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin or levofloxaicin, cefepime, aztreonam, carbapenems, gentamicin, ticarcillin and, ureidopenicillin.In cases of surgery, where the wounds infected by Pseudomonas, procedures such as removing of eschars surgically, and debridement of the necrotic tissue and in other cases amputation of affected organ may be necessary. According to Magalhaes (3), it is recommended that the doctor performs a susceptibility test to determine the appropriate drug or the best combination of drugs.Pseudomonas causes a wide variety of disease. They could be severe and result to death. The patients and the medical specialists should be educated about ways of preventing these infections example practicing good hygiene. They should also be educated about the possible bad effects of the medications used and monitoring should be done. Infections from P. aeruginosa are prevented so as to avoid its adverse effects as they are life-threatening.Reference (s)Center for disease Control and Prevention. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Health care Settings. March 2018Ben Ryall, Marta Carrara, James EA Zlosnik, Volker Behrends, Xiaoyun Lee, Zhean Wong, Kathryn E. Lougheed, Huw D. Williams. The mucoid switch in Pseudomonas aeruginosa represses quorum sensing systems and leads to complex changes to stationary phase virulence factor regulation. Vol 9. May 2014Magalhaes A, Lopes SP, Pereira MO. Insights into Cystic Fibrosis Polymicrobial Consortia: The Role of Species interactions in Biofilm Development, Phenotype, and Response to In-Use Antibiotics. Vol 7. January 13, 2017.Gary W. Procop, Deirdre L. Church, Geraldine S. Hall. Konenams color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 7th edition. 2017De la Fuente-Nunez, C., Ruffureveille, F., Mansour, S.C. D-enantiomric peptides that eradicate wild-type and multidrug resistant biofilms and protect lethal Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. 2015.Darch, S E., McNally, A., Harrision, F., corander, J., Barr, H. L., Paszkiewicz, K., & Diggle S. P. “Recombination is a key driver of genomic and phenotypic diversity in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa population during Cystic fibrosis infection” 2015.Win Stanley, C., O’Brien, S., & Brock Hurst, M. A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa evolutionary adaptation and diversification in cystic fibrosis chronic lung infections. 2016: 327-337.Langan, K. M., Koitsimbos, T., & Peleg, A. Y. Managing Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infections in Cystic fibrosis. 2015 :547-556Williams, D., Evans,B., Haldenby, S., Walshaw, M. j., Brock Hurst, M. A., Winstanley, C., & Paterson , S. divergent, co-existing Pseudomonas aeruginosa lineages in chronic cystic fibrosis lung infections. 2015: 775-785.Ahlgren, H. G., Benedetti, A., Landry, J.S., Bernier , J., Matouk, E., Radzioch, &Nguyen, D. Clinical outcomes associated with staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infections in adult cystic fibrosis patients. 2015.